<\/p>\n
Florida Rep. Mike Haridopolos has renewed his push for the CLARITY Act as Senate delays narrow the bill\u2019s path to passage before the August recess.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Haridopolos, a Republican member of the House Financial Services Committee, defended the CLARITY Act during a July 28 appearance on Fox Business\u2019 Mornings with Maria. He argued that the legislation is needed to keep digital asset activity within the United States.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cThis is about making sure that American markets are the premier markets in the world.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Haridopolos also accused Senate Democrats of using procedural delays to block legislation supported by voters. Fox Business described the bill as stalled<\/a> as lawmakers approach their summer break.<\/p>\n
Haridopolos voted for the House version in July 2025. The measure passed by a bipartisan 294\u2013134 vote, with 78 Democrats joining 216 Republicans, according to the House Financial Services Committee<\/a>.<\/p>\n
The legislation would establish separate responsibilities for the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Its backers say those rules would give exchanges, token issuers and blockchain developers a clearer route to operate in the US.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Senate schedule delays CLARITY Act vote<\/h2>\n
Senate Majority Leader John Thune has temporarily shifted floor attention toward a group of federal nominees and the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026.<\/p>\n
That schedule makes action on the CLARITY Act unlikely before the final week of the current session. The Senate\u2019s summer break is scheduled to begin after August 7, with a state work period running from August 10 through September 11, according to the official Senate calendar<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Thune has indicated that the Senate may still take preliminary action before the break, but leadership first needs to determine whether enough votes are available. The bill requires at least eight Democratic votes to advance under the current Senate balance.<\/p>\n
The Senate Banking Committee advanced the legislation by a 15\u20139 vote in May, with two Democrats supporting it at the committee stage. However, both indicated that their support did not guarantee a floor vote without further changes.<\/p>\n
Ethics and state enforcement remain disputed<\/h2>\n
Negotiations now center on restrictions covering elected officials and their digital asset interests. The Senate draft would temporarily bar certain officials, including the president and vice president, from issuing or sponsoring crypto assets until January 2029.<\/p>\n
Enforcement would rest with the Justice Department. Democrats have objected because the draft would prevent state attorneys general from acting if federal officials decline to bring a case. The bill needs more Democratic support before it can move forward.<\/p>\n
New York Attorney General Letitia James has raised a separate concern over state authority. She argued that the bill could override state digital asset rules and weaken local efforts to pursue crypto scams.<\/p>\n