{"id":32651,"date":"2026-06-22T12:02:26","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T12:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/money-is-rotating-from-bitcoin-into-xrp-what-the-etf-flows-show\/"},"modified":"2026-06-22T12:02:35","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T12:02:35","slug":"money-is-rotating-from-bitcoin-into-xrp-what-the-etf-flows-show","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/money-is-rotating-from-bitcoin-into-xrp-what-the-etf-flows-show\/","title":{"rendered":"Money is rotating from Bitcoin into XRP. What the ETF flows show"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div class=\"post-detail__content blocks\">\n<p class=\"is-style-lead\">While Bitcoin ETFs bled $1.44 billion in a single week, XRP funds quietly logged their sixth straight week of inflows. It looks like institutions are rotating out of Bitcoin and into XRP. The flows are real, but what they mean is more complicated, and more interesting, than the headline.<\/p>\n<div id=\"cn-block-summary-block_5ba6e5b0ac0e5ee002b52d61e48c7a76\" class=\"cn-block-summary\">\n<div class=\"cn-block-summary__nav tabs\">\n        <span class=\"tabs__item is-selected\">Summary<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"cn-block-summary__content\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Bitcoin ETFs saw heavy outflows while XRP funds logged six straight weeks of inflows.<\/li>\n<li>The rotation is real in direction, but much smaller than the headline suggests.<\/li>\n<li>XRP\u2019s regulatory clarity and CLARITY catalyst are central to the institutional bid.<\/li>\n<li>The inflows signal long-term conviction, not a near-term price guarantee.<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- .cn-block-summary --><\/p>\n<p>Something unusual is happening in the flow of institutional money through crypto exchange-traded funds. In a single recent week, United States spot Bitcoin ETFs shed roughly $1.44 billion, the largest weekly outflow of 2026, while spot XRP ETFs did the opposite, drawing fresh money and extending a streak that has now reached six consecutive weeks of inflows.<\/p>\n<p>Those XRP funds have drawn around $1.44 billion since launching in November 2025. Ethereum funds bled too, losing hundreds of millions, while XRP and Solana products absorbed a combined couple hundred million.<\/p>\n<p>On the surface, the story writes itself: institutions are rotating out of Bitcoin and Ethereum and into XRP, a changing of the guard in where the smart money wants exposure. The flows are real and the divergence is striking.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">NEW: XRP ETF flows beat Bitcoin and Ethereum for the fifth straight week. The trend signals persistent institutional demand despite bearish crypto sentiment <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/1K0bS8tpBH\">https:\/\/t.co\/1K0bS8tpBH<\/a> <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/l2Ssts0JLN\">pic.twitter.com\/l2Ssts0JLN<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/cryptodotnews\/status\/2066151671189623092?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 14, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p>But what the rotation actually means is more complicated than the headline, and understanding the nuance is the difference between reading a genuine signal and overreading a small one.<\/p>\n<p>This piece works through what the ETF flow data actually shows, why XRP is attracting money while Bitcoin bleeds, the crucial caveat about the relative size of these flows, what the rotation does and does not tell us about XRP\u2019s prospects, why the inflows have not lifted XRP\u2019s price, and how to read this kind of flow data without drawing more from it than it supports.<\/p>\n<p>The rotation is a real phenomenon worth understanding, a sign of building institutional conviction in XRP specifically, but it is also a small rotation in absolute terms, easy to inflate into something larger than it is. The goal is to read it accurately, neither dismissing a genuine signal nor mistaking a trickle for a flood.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- .cn-block-related-link --><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What the flow data actually shows<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>To read the rotation correctly, you have to start with the precise numbers, because the headline divergence is real but the details matter for interpreting it.<\/p>\n<p>The recent flow data shows a clear split. United States spot Bitcoin ETFs have been bleeding, with one recent week seeing roughly $1.44 billion in outflows, the largest single-week Bitcoin ETF outflow of 2026, part of a sustained streak in which Bitcoin funds have net-sold on the order of $2.6 billion year-to-date.<\/p>\n<p>Ethereum funds have bled alongside Bitcoin, losing hundreds of millions in the same stretch. Against this, XRP funds have stood out.<\/p>\n<p>Spot XRP ETFs logged six consecutive weeks of net inflows through mid-June, accumulating around $1.44 billion since their launch in November 2025, with one recent week drawing $67.6 million, a sharp increase over the prior week, even as Bitcoin and Ethereum shed money.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">NEW: XRP spot ETFs recorded net inflows of $10.68 million last week <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/1K0bS8tpBH\">https:\/\/t.co\/1K0bS8tpBH<\/a> <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/NZ1XjYFR5f\">pic.twitter.com\/NZ1XjYFR5f<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/cryptodotnews\/status\/2066635106433790356?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p>Solana ETFs have also drawn inflows, so that XRP and Solana together pulled in a couple hundred million while the two largest assets\u2019 funds bled.<\/p>\n<p>The pattern is what makes this notable: it is not a case of all crypto ETFs gaining or losing together, which would simply reflect broad sentiment. It is a divergence, money leaving the Bitcoin and Ethereum funds while flowing into the XRP and Solana funds.<\/p>\n<p>That is the signature of rotation, capital moving from one part of the market to another, not into or out of the asset class as a whole. For readers who need the mechanics first, how crypto ETFs work is the base layer for understanding why these flows matter.<\/p>\n<p>The breadth of the inflows has also narrowed, with only a handful of assets attracting meaningful institutional money in recent weeks, down from a broader group earlier. That suggests institutions are picking specific names instead of buying altcoins indiscriminately.<\/p>\n<p>XRP has consistently been one of those picked names, leading the narrow group of assets bucking the institutional selling. So the data clearly shows institutions selectively favoring XRP with fresh capital at a time when they are pulling money out of Bitcoin and Ethereum, which is a real and specific signal about XRP, not just noise.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Why XRP is attracting money while Bitcoin bleeds<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The rotation is not random; there are specific reasons institutions are choosing XRP at this moment, and understanding them explains what the flows are actually responding to.<\/p>\n<p>The clearest driver is XRP\u2019s improving regulatory position. After Ripple\u2019s long legal battle with the SEC ended favorably and XRP gained clearer regulatory status, including the agency-level commodity treatment it received in early 2026, XRP became one of the few major altcoins with relative regulatory clarity.<\/p>\n<p>Institutions value that highly because they need defined legal treatment before committing fiduciary money. The prospect of the CLARITY Act codifying that status into federal law adds to the appeal, giving institutions a forward-looking reason to accumulate XRP ahead of a potential demand catalyst.<\/p>\n<p>That is the bigger institutional demand case: if legal clarity turns into ETF demand at scale, the flows could become more than a quiet undercurrent. This regulatory clarity is a genuine differentiator.<\/p>\n<p>Where many altcoins still sit in legal gray zones, XRP has a comparatively defined status and a legislative tailwind. That makes it a natural choice for institutions wanting altcoin exposure with less regulatory risk.<\/p>\n<p>Several other factors reinforce the appeal. XRP has a distinct, identifiable real-world use case in cross-border payments and settlement, which gives institutions a fundamental story to point to beyond speculation.<\/p>\n<p>Ripple\u2019s expanding institutional partnerships, including its involvement in tokenization initiatives with major financial infrastructure players, deepen that story. There is also a novelty and narrative premium: the XRP ETFs are newer than the Bitcoin funds, and newer products with specific, compelling narratives can attract concentrated interest as investors who wanted XRP exposure through a regulated wrapper finally get it.<\/p>\n<p>There is also a diversification motive. With Bitcoin and Ethereum under pressure and their ETFs bleeding, institutions looking to stay in crypto but reduce exposure to the struggling majors can rotate into a name like XRP that has its own distinct catalysts.<\/p>\n<p>That is where the Bitcoin weakness driving rotation matters. The flow shift is not happening in a vacuum; it is happening during a year when Bitcoin itself has stopped acting like the obvious winner in institutional crypto portfolios.<\/p>\n<p>The combination, regulatory clarity, a real use case, expanding partnerships, a newer product, and diversification away from the weak majors, explains why XRP specifically has been the destination for money leaving Bitcoin. The flows are responding to a real and specific case for XRP.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- .cn-block-related-link --><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The caveat that changes everything: relative size<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Here is the crucial qualification that most rotation headlines omit, and it reframes the entire story: the XRP inflows, while real and notable, are tiny next to the Bitcoin outflows in absolute terms.<\/p>\n<p>The numbers that look like a dramatic changing of the guard are wildly mismatched in scale. The Bitcoin ETFs that shed $1.44 billion in a week sit on cumulative net inflows of roughly $53.67 billion since their 2024 launch, an enormous base.<\/p>\n<p>The XRP ETFs that have drawn so much attention have accumulated around $1.44 billion total since their November 2025 launch, a fraction of the Bitcoin total. The XRP funds\u2019 assets under management are something like 40 to 50 times smaller than the Bitcoin funds.<\/p>\n<p>That means the same dollar inflow represents a far larger move for the small XRP funds than for the giant Bitcoin funds. When you read that XRP funds drew $67.6 million in a week while Bitcoin funds lost $1.44 billion, the XRP figure is roughly 2% of the Bitcoin outflow.<\/p>\n<p>So the rotation is real in direction but small in magnitude: a trickle into XRP against a flood out of Bitcoin, not an equal and opposite migration.<\/p>\n<p>This relative-size caveat matters because it determines how much weight to put on the rotation. The headline \u201cmoney is rotating from Bitcoin into XRP\u201d is directionally true, but it creates an impression of scale that the numbers do not support.<\/p>\n<p>It suggests a large reallocation when the reality is a small, selective inflow into a much smaller fund category against a large outflow from a much larger one. The velocity of the XRP inflows looks impressive precisely because the base is so small, the same way a small company can post huge growth that amounts to little in absolute dollars.<\/p>\n<p>None of this makes the XRP inflows meaningless, since a sustained, six-week streak of selective institutional buying is a real signal of conviction. But it does mean the rotation should be understood as a small and specific vote of confidence in XRP, not as a massive reallocation of institutional capital from Bitcoin into XRP, which is the impression the headline can leave.<\/p>\n<p>The direction is the signal; the magnitude is the caveat. Ignoring the magnitude is how a trickle gets mistaken for a flood.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What the rotation does and does not tell us<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>With the size caveat in place, the rotation can be read for what it truly signals about XRP, while staying clear about what it cannot tell us.<\/p>\n<p>What the rotation does tell us is meaningful: a segment of institutional investors has enough conviction in XRP specifically to keep buying it through a regulated product even while they pull money out of the largest crypto assets. They have done so consistently over six weeks rather than in a one-off burst.<\/p>\n<p>That selectivity is the valuable part, because institutions choosing XRP while selling Bitcoin and Ethereum are making a deliberate, name-specific bet, not merely riding broad sentiment. That signals real and building institutional interest in XRP\u2019s particular case: the regulatory clarity, the use case, and the CLARITY catalyst.<\/p>\n<p>Sustained inflows of this kind are a reasonable indicator of accumulating long-term institutional conviction, the kind of patient positioning that can matter over time as a base of committed holders builds. The rotation is real evidence that XRP has won a place in some institutional portfolios as a favored altcoin.<\/p>\n<p>It also sits alongside another XRP demand signal, the drawdown in exchange reserves that suggests less sellable supply is sitting on trading venues. Taken together, the ETF and reserve data describe a market where long-term positioning is quietly improving.<\/p>\n<p>What the rotation does not tell us is equally important. It does not tell us that XRP\u2019s price will rise soon, because, as the next section explains, these inflows have coincided with a falling price.<\/p>\n<p>It does not tell us the rotation is large enough to move the market, given the small absolute size of the flows relative to XRP\u2019s market capitalization and to the Bitcoin outflows. And it does not tell us that the trend will continue, since flow patterns can reverse, and six weeks is a meaningful but not decisive streak.<\/p>\n<p>The accurate reading is that the rotation is a real, positive, long-term signal about institutional conviction in XRP, and not a prediction of near-term price strength or evidence of a market-moving capital shift. It tells us institutions increasingly want XRP exposure.<\/p>\n<p>It does not tell us when or whether that translates into price. Holding those two truths together, real conviction signal and no near-term price guarantee, is the accurate way to read it.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- .cn-block-related-link --><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Why the inflows have not lifted the price<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The most confusing part of the rotation story is that XRP\u2019s price has fallen even as the inflows accumulated, and resolving that apparent paradox is key to reading the flows correctly.<\/p>\n<p>The explanation is straightforward once the scale is clear: the ETF inflows, while a positive signal, are small relative to the overall selling pressure on XRP from the broader market. XRP trades in a market dominated by macro forces and technical selling.<\/p>\n<p>Through 2026, those forces have been bearish, with the broad crypto downturn, a hawkish macro backdrop, and XRP\u2019s own technical breakdown all pushing the price down. Against that, a trickle of ETF inflows, even a sustained one, is simply not large enough to overcome the selling.<\/p>\n<p>That is why inflows have not lifted the price. The market can absorb institutional buying and still fall if the larger marginal flows are coming from sellers.<\/p>\n<p>This is the same relative-size point from before, applied to price: the inflows are real but too small to be the dominant force setting XRP\u2019s price in a market where larger bearish forces are at work.<\/p>\n<p>This is why the analysts tracking these flows have been careful to frame them as a long-term signal of building institutional conviction, not an immediate price catalyst. The inflows represent patient accumulation by institutions positioning for the longer term.<\/p>\n<p>The day-to-day price is set by the larger and more bearish short-term forces. The two can coexist: institutions can be steadily accumulating XRP through ETFs in the belief that it will matter eventually, while the price falls in the near term under macro and technical pressure that dwarfs the inflows.<\/p>\n<p>For anyone reading the rotation as a reason to expect XRP to rise immediately, this is the essential correction. The inflows are a vote of long-term confidence, not a near-term price engine, and expecting them to lift the price soon misreads their scale.<\/p>\n<p>The conviction is real and may matter over time, especially if a catalyst like CLARITY shifts the larger forces. But in the present, the inflows are a quiet undercurrent beneath a stronger bearish tide, which is exactly why the price can fall while the funds buy.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>How to read flow data without overreading it<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The rotation story is a useful case study in how to read ETF flow data sensibly, because it is the kind of data that is easy to inflate, and a few principles keep it in proportion.<\/p>\n<p>The first principle is to always check absolute size against relative size. A flow figure in isolation, \u201c$67.6 million into XRP,\u201d or a sharp week-over-week jump, can look dramatic while representing a small absolute sum against a much larger market.<\/p>\n<p>The meaningful question is always how the flow compares to the asset\u2019s market capitalization, to the flows in other assets, and to the forces actually moving the price. In XRP\u2019s case, checking the size immediately reveals that the inflows, while a real signal, are small next to both the Bitcoin outflows and XRP\u2019s own market.<\/p>\n<p>That deflates the \u201cmassive rotation\u201d impression to its accurate size: a small, selective inflow. The second principle is to separate the direction of a flow from its magnitude.<\/p>\n<p>The rotation is directionally meaningful, institutions favoring XRP, while being small in magnitude. Conflating the two is how a genuine but minor signal gets read as a major one.<\/p>\n<p>The third principle is to distinguish a flow signal from a price prediction. ETF flows tell you about positioning and conviction, who is accumulating or distributing, but they are one input among many into price.<\/p>\n<p>As XRP shows, inflows can coincide with a falling price when other forces dominate. Reading flows as a direct price predictor ignores the larger context that actually sets the price.<\/p>\n<p>The disciplined approach treats sustained, selective inflows as a meaningful signal of building conviction, weighs them honestly against their small absolute size and the larger forces at work, and resists the temptation to translate a flow signal directly into a price expectation.<\/p>\n<p>Applied to XRP, this yields the accurate reading: a real, positive, long-term signal of institutional interest, small in scale, that has not and need not lift the price in the near term. The flow data is truly informative when read in proportion, and misleading when inflated.<\/p>\n<p>The difference is whether you check the size and separate the signal from the prediction. None of this is investment advice; it is a frame for reading flow data as the partial, sized signal it actually is.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>A real signal, in proportion<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The rotation from Bitcoin into XRP is a real phenomenon, and a truly interesting one. While Bitcoin ETFs shed $1.44 billion in their worst week of 2026 and Ethereum funds bled alongside them, XRP funds logged a sixth straight week of inflows.<\/p>\n<p>Those XRP funds have now drawn around $1.44 billion since their late-2025 launch, as institutions selectively favored XRP for its regulatory clarity, its cross-border use case, its expanding partnerships, and the CLARITY catalyst ahead.<\/p>\n<p>The divergence is the signature of rotation, capital moving toward XRP and away from the struggling majors, and it signals building, name-specific institutional conviction in XRP, which is a real and positive development.<\/p>\n<p>But the story has to be read in proportion, and the proportion changes the headline. The XRP inflows, however notable, are tiny next to the Bitcoin outflows and XRP\u2019s own market, a trickle against a flood, with the XRP funds 40 to 50 times smaller than the Bitcoin funds.<\/p>\n<p>That small size is exactly why the inflows have not lifted XRP\u2019s price, which has fallen under macro and technical pressure that dwarfs the ETF bid. The flows are a long-term signal of conviction rather than a near-term price catalyst.<\/p>\n<p>The accurate reading holds both truths: institutions are truly and increasingly choosing XRP, a meaningful vote of long-term confidence, and that vote is small in scale and has not moved the price, which the larger bearish forces still control.<\/p>\n<p>The money rotating into XRP is a real signal worth knowing, as long as it is read for what it is: a quiet, selective undercurrent of institutional conviction, and not the great capital migration the headline can suggest. The direction is the news; the size is the discipline.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Frequently asked questions<\/strong><\/h2>\n<div id=\"rank-math-faq\" class=\"rank-math-block\">\n<div class=\"rank-math-list \">\n<div id=\"faq-question-1782123611134\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question \"><strong>Is money really rotating from Bitcoin into XRP?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer \">\n<p>Directionally, yes. In one recent week, US spot Bitcoin ETFs shed about $1.44 billion, their largest weekly outflow of 2026, while spot XRP ETFs drew fresh money, extending a streak to six consecutive weeks of inflows totaling around $1.44 billion since their November 2025 launch. Ethereum funds also bled while XRP and Solana funds gained. This divergence, money leaving the majors and flowing into XRP, is the signature of rotation, capital moving within crypto rather than out of it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1782123618856\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question \"><strong>Why are institutions buying XRP while selling Bitcoin?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer \">\n<p>Mainly XRP\u2019s improving regulatory position. After Ripple\u2019s favorable SEC outcome and XRP\u2019s commodity treatment, it became one of the few major altcoins with relative regulatory clarity, which institutions value, and the CLARITY Act could codify that status. XRP also has a distinct cross-border payments use case, expanding institutional partnerships, and a newer ETF product with a compelling narrative. With Bitcoin and Ethereum under pressure, institutions can diversify into a name like XRP that has its own specific catalysts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1782123626574\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question \"><strong>How big are the XRP inflows compared to Bitcoin?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer \">\n<p>Much smaller, which is the key caveat. XRP ETFs have accumulated around $1.44 billion total since launch, while Bitcoin ETFs sit on roughly $53.67 billion cumulative net inflows, and the XRP funds\u2019 assets are about 40 to 50 times smaller. The week XRP drew $67.6 million, Bitcoin lost $1.44 billion, so the XRP figure was roughly 2% of the Bitcoin outflow. The rotation is real in direction but small in magnitude, a trickle into XRP against a flood out of Bitcoin, not an equal migration.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1782123636530\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question \"><strong>Why has the price of XRP not risen if money is flowing in?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer \">\n<p>Because the inflows, while a positive signal, are small relative to the broader selling pressure on XRP. The token trades in a market dominated by macro forces and technical selling, which have been bearish in 2026, and a trickle of ETF inflows is not large enough to overcome that. The price has fallen even as funds accumulated XRP because the macro pressure outweighs the ETF bid. Analysts frame the inflows as a long-term conviction signal, not an immediate price catalyst.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1782123644876\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question \"><strong>What does the rotation tell us about XRP?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer \">\n<p>It tells us a segment of institutions has enough conviction in XRP specifically to keep buying it through a regulated product, consistently over six weeks, even while selling the largest crypto assets. That is a deliberate, name-specific bet signaling building long-term institutional interest. It does not tell us the price will rise soon, that the flows are large enough to move the market, or that the trend will continue. It is a genuine long-term conviction signal, not a near-term price prediction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1782123652945\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question \"><strong>How should I read crypto ETF flow data?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer \">\n<p>Check absolute size against relative size, since a figure or percentage can look dramatic while being small against the broader market. Separate the direction of a flow, which can be meaningful, from its magnitude, which may be small. Also distinguish a flow signal from a price prediction, because flows show positioning and conviction but are only one input among many. As XRP shows, inflows can coincide with a falling price when larger forces dominate. Read sustained, selective inflows as a conviction signal, weighed honestly against their scale. This is not investment advice.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><em>As of June 21, 2026. Flow data and markets change quickly; verify current figures before relying on this analysis. This article is information, not investment advice.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>    <!-- .cn-block-related-link --><\/p><\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While Bitcoin ETFs bled $1.44 billion in a single week, XRP funds quietly logged their sixth straight week of inflows. It looks like institutions are rotating out of Bitcoin and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32652,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cryptocurrency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32651"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32653,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32651\/revisions\/32653"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}