<\/p>\n
Polymarket has finalized a disputed prediction market with a \u201cNo\u201d outcome after 98.6% of voting power backed the decision in a final UMA review, despite Strategy disclosing that it sold 32 Bitcoin before the market\u2019s May 31 deadline.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
According to Polymarket\u2019s market data, the contract asking whether Strategy would sell any Bitcoin by May 31 completed its final review on Wednesday, ending a dispute that had already triggered two previous \u201cNo\u201d resolutions and subsequent challenges.<\/p>\n
At the center of the disagreement is Strategy\u2019s June 1 regulatory filing, which revealed that the company sold 32 BTC for roughly $2.5 million between May 26 and May 31.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Traders who supported a \u201cYes\u201d outcome argued that the sale itself occurred before the deadline stated in the market question. Others maintained that the transaction was not publicly confirmed until after the deadline had passed.<\/p>\n
Days before the final review concluded, Polymarket added a note to the market page stating that \u201cconfirmation achieved outside of the market\u2019s time frame does not qualify.\u201d The clarification became a key point in the debate over how the contract should be resolved.<\/p>\n
Across social media, several traders criticized the decision and questioned whether the outcome matched the original wording of the contract.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Among the most vocal participants was trader 0xDinosaur, who previously disclosed that he had purchased 49,695.76 \u201cYes\u201d shares for about 35,000 USDC.\u00a0<\/p>\n