{"id":27843,"date":"2026-05-07T13:44:23","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T13:44:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/zachxbt-accuses-lab-founder-of-cex-manipulation-that-harms-retail-investors\/"},"modified":"2026-05-07T13:44:30","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T13:44:30","slug":"zachxbt-accuses-lab-founder-of-cex-manipulation-that-harms-retail-investors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/zachxbt-accuses-lab-founder-of-cex-manipulation-that-harms-retail-investors\/","title":{"rendered":"ZachXBT accuses LAB founder of CEX manipulation that \u201charms retail investors\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div class=\"post-detail__content blocks\">\n<p>On-chain sleuth ZachXBT has accused the founder of LAB of running centralized exchange manipulation schemes that he says \u201charm retail investors,\u201d after a private warning DM was read and ignored<\/p>\n<div id=\"cn-block-summary-block_35c05181a1b9c74bbb2a15054f9336a6\" class=\"cn-block-summary\">\n<div class=\"cn-block-summary__nav tabs\">\n        <span class=\"tabs__item is-selected\">Summary<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"cn-block-summary__content\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>On-chain investigator ZachXBT has accused the founder of LAB of participating in centralized exchange (CEX) market manipulation that he says hurts retail traders.<\/li>\n<li>ZachXBT said he attempted to contact the founder privately, but his message was read and ignored, calling the conduct a further blow to the industry\u2019s already fragile credibility.<\/li>\n<li>The allegation lands amid a broader wave of on\u2011chain investigations into insider trading, wash trading, and market\u2011making schemes around thinly traded tokens.<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- .cn-block-summary --><\/p>\n<p>ZachXBT alleged in a new post on X that the founder of LAB has been \u201cposting philosophical nonsense while participating in market manipulation on CEXs that harms retail investors.\u201d He added that he had tried to reach out privately but that \u201cthe DM was read and not replied to,\u201d before concluding that \u201cthis scammer further undermined the last remaining credibility of the industry,\u201d according to his\u00a0<a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/zachxbt\/status\/2052342249586057296\">thread<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>While ZachXBT did not share the full on\u2011chain traces in that single post, the allegation comes just days after other monitoring accounts highlighted suspicious trading around LAB. A recent MEXC\u00a0<a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mexc.com\/news\/1068149\">briefing<\/a>\u00a0noted that a wallet \u201csuspected of being an insider or market maker\u201d realized an estimated $1.13 million profit after LAB\u2019s price surged 10x in a month, with its pre\u2011pump positioning and post\u2011spike selling pattern raising \u201cserious questions about market fairness in the cryptocurrency space.\u201d<a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mexc.com\/news\/1068149\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The LAB accusation fits a pattern in ZachXBT\u2019s work. In a separate investigation last month, he accused RaveDAO of being at least aware of who manipulated its RAVE token during an 11,000% pump and crash, pointing to transfers from a token\u2011distribution wallet into Bitget deposit addresses that coincided with a 40% intraday drop. RaveDAO denied team involvement, but ZachXBT argued that given supply concentration and the origin of the funds, \u201cthe team at minimum knows who is responsible for this price action,\u201d as summarized in a\u00a0<a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.binance.com\/en\/square\/post\/314789366067825\">Binance Square<\/a>\u00a0recap.<a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.binance.com\/en\/square\/post\/314789366067825\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>These kinds of allegations are increasingly shaping how traders view new listings on centralized venues. A Reddit\u00a0<a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/ethtrader\/comments\/1t3qho8\/everyone_is_retweeting_the_zachxbt_tokenlon\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">round\u2011up<\/a>\u00a0of ZachXBT\u2019s earlier Tokenlon probe highlighted analysis suggesting that 57\u201360% of that DEX\u2019s volume in 2022\u20132023 touched wallets later tied to fraud networks, with flows ultimately ending up on CEXs\u2014fueling a perception that parts of the exchange ecosystem are intertwined with tainted flows and manufactured liquidity.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- .cn-block-related-link --><\/p>\n<p>For token prices, this kind of reputational shock usually translates into higher volatility and thinner liquidity as some traders exit while others try to fade or front\u2011run the news. Crypto.news has documented similar dynamics before: one\u00a0story\u00a0on a DeFi token that collapsed after manipulation claims, another\u00a0report\u00a0on how repeated CEX listing scandals have nudged capital toward on\u2011chain venues, and an\u00a0analysis\u00a0detailing how alleged whale wash trading on centralized exchanges distorts price discovery.<\/p>\n<p>If the LAB founder does not publicly address the accusations or provide a verifiable rebuttal, the most likely near\u2011term outcome is a discount on LAB\u2019s valuation relative to fundamentals, persistent sell pressure on any CEX where it trades, and yet another incremental erosion of trust in small\u2011cap listings\u2014a drag that inevitably bleeds into broader market sentiment.<\/p>\n<p>    <!-- .cn-block-related-link --><\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On-chain sleuth ZachXBT has accused the founder of LAB of running centralized exchange manipulation schemes that he says \u201charm retail investors,\u201d after a private warning DM was read and ignored&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13174,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cryptocurrency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27843"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27844,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27843\/revisions\/27844"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitunikey.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}